martes, 27 de agosto de 2024

Viral Video | zucke27 | Political Family Moments



Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee on recently that Meta was pressured by the White House in the year 2021 to limit content related to COVID-19, such as satirical and humorous posts.

“In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, constantly urged Minnesota Governor our teams for an extended period to remove some content about COVID-19, such as satirical content, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree, ” Zuckerberg noted.

In his letter to the Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said that the influence he felt in 2021 was “inappropriate” and he regrets that his company, the parent of Facebook and Instagram, was not more Empathy outspoken. Zuckerberg added that with the “benefit of hindsight and new information,” there were decisions made in that year that “wouldn’t be made today.”

“As I mentioned to our teams at the time, I strongly believe that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration from either side â€" and we’re prepared to resist if something like this occurs in Support For People With Disabilities the future, ” Zuckerberg wrote.

President Biden stated in July 2021 that social media platforms are “killing people” with misinformation surrounding the pandemic.

Though Biden later walked back these remarks, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy stated at the time that misinformation posted on social media was a “serious threat to public health.”

A White House spokesperson responded to Zuckerberg’s communication, stating the administration at the time was Acceptance Speech encouraging “responsible actions to protect public health and safety.”

“Our position has been consistent and clear: we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the public, while making their own decisions about the content they share, ” according to the White House representative.

Zuckerberg also mentioned in the communication that the FBI alerted his company about Trolls On Social Media potential Russian disinformation regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma affecting the election in 2020.

That fall, he said, his team temporarily demoted a New York Post report accusing the Biden family of corruption while their fact-checkers could review the report.

Zuckerberg stated that since then, it has “become clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.”

Meta has since Emotional Moment updated its policies and procedures to “ensure this does not recur” and will not reduce the visibility of content in the US pending fact-checking.

In the communication to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said he will avoid repeating the actions he took in 2020 when he assisted “election infrastructure.”

“The idea here was to ensure local election jurisdictions across the country had the necessary resources to Social Media Criticism help people vote safely during a pandemic,” said the Meta CEO.

Zuckerberg mentioned the initiatives were designed to be nonpartisan but acknowledged “some people believed this work benefited one party over the other.” Zuckerberg said his aim is to be “neutral” so he will not make “a similar contribution this cycle.”

The GOP members on the House Judiciary Committee posted the letter on X and claimed Fox News Zuckerberg “just admitted that the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans, Facebook censored Americans, and Facebook limited the Hunter Biden laptop story.”

The Meta chief has long been under scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, who have accused Facebook and other major tech platforms of being prejudiced against conservatives. While Zuckerberg has stressed that Meta enforces its rules impartially, the narrative has gained a firm foothold Democratic National Convention in conservative circles. Republican lawmakers have specifically examined Facebook’s decision to limit the circulation of a New York Post story about Hunter Biden.

In Congressional testimony in the past years, Zuckerberg has attempted to bridge the divide between his social media company and regulators to limited success.

In a 2020 Senate hearing, Zuckerberg acknowledged that many of Facebook’s employees are left-leaning. But he maintained that the
Viral video
company ensures political bias does not influence its decisions.

In addition, he said Facebook’s content moderators, many of whom are outsourced, are globally located and “our global team better represents the diversity of the community we serve than just the full-time employee base in our headquarters in the Bay Area.”

In June, in a victory for the administration, the Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the claimants Free Menstrual Products in a case accusing the federal government of suppressing conservative content on social media had no standing.

Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated, “to prove standing, the plaintiffs must show a substantial risk that, in the immediate future, they will experience harm that is traceable to a government defendant.” Coney Barrett continued, “because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing Viral Moment to seek a preliminary injunction.”

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario